EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND ITS EFFECT ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY: A CASE STUDY AT UNIVERSITAS BHINNEKA PGRI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether students' English speaking ability is influenced by their educational background. This study is a quantitative causal comparative study. The population of this study is all students from the English Education Study Program at Universitas Bhinneka PGRI academic year 2024/2025. The sample for this study consists of 15 sixth-semester students with high school (SMA) and vocational high school (SMK) backgrounds. The sample used by the researcher is purposive sampling. The instruments used to collect data are questionnaires and speaking tests. Data analysis was conducted using the Independent T-Test in the IBM SPSS Statistics 25 program for Windows.
The findings indicate that the English speaking ability of high school graduates is better than that of vocational school graduates. This is evidenced by the significant value of 0.004 < 0.05, which means that there is a statistically significant difference between high school graduates and vocational school graduates. Additionally, this is supported by the data from the research questionnaire. Based on the questionnaire data in the Background factors section, high school graduates showed a result of 64.25%, indicating that their background helped them speak English. For vocational school graduates, the data showed a result of 62.5%, but this result was not higher than that of high school graduates. Based on the research results, educational background influences students' English speaking ability.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Afifi, F. H., Saputra, H. D., Nasir, M., & Putra, D. S. (2023). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Tamatan SMA dan SMK, Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Teknik Otomotif Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang. MSI Transaction on Education, 4(1), 13–22. http://www.msirp.org/journal/index.php/mted/article/view/104.
Azmi, D. (2020). The effect of english course towards students ’ speaking ability. 1–57.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development Experiments by Nature and Design. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0A
Brown, H. D. (2018). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Chaney, A. L. (1998). Teaching oral communication in grades K-8. Allyn & Bacon.
Collin, A., & O’Brien, M. (2011). Educational background and its influence on learner outcomes. In D. Boud & N. Solomon (Eds.), Work and learning: An introduction (pp. 45–62). Routledge.
Dari, U. (2020). Pengaruh Latar Belakang Pendidikan Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi Di Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau (Vol. 2507, Issue February).
Destiawati, L., Zulfa, V., & Marsita, J. (2024). The Effect of Self-Confidence on Students’ English Speaking Ability in Front Office Subjects at State Vocational School 32 Jakarta. International Education Trend Issues, 2(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i2.761
EF English Proficiency Index. (2024). EF EPI 2024 - Indonesia. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2015). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hampp, L., Kumayas, T. H. J., & Lengkoan, F. (2021). Language as a tool of communication in society. Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 6(2), 75–83.
Husna, Z. (2021). The impact of students’ educational background toward their ability in speaking english. 53.
Liu, F. & Rao, Z. (2024). The effects of cultural and educational background on students’ use of language learning strategies in CFL learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(5), 2175-2194. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0033
Lubis, E. A. (2020). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matakuliah Pengantar Dasar Matematika Berdasarkan Latar Belakang Pendidikan Mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris/Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Padangsidimpuan. http://etd.uinsyahada.ac.id/id/eprint/6199%0Ahttp://etd.uinsyahada.ac.id/6199/1/1620200064.pdf
Luo, Z. (2024). A Review of Krashen’s Input Theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.54097/3fnf5786
Muhammad, A. F. (2018). The Influence of Students’ Educational Background on Their Achievement in Learning English. In JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching) (Vol. 4, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v4i2.757
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
Pulingkong, M., Oddang, h., & Asrial. (2022). perbandingan hasil belajar mahasiswa berlatar belakang smk dan sma program studi pendidikan teknik bangunan fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan universitas nusa cendana. 16(2).
Rao, P. S. (2019). the importance of speaking skills in english classrooms. 401(2), 1–23.
Ria Rezeki, Sujarwo, & Muliaty Ibrahim. (2022). The Teacher’s Strategies in Overcoming Students’ Speaking Problems at SMAN 1 Selayar. Edulec : Education, Language and Culture Journal, 2(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.56314/edulec.v2i1.33
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Berbicara sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Angkasa.
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teachingv Speaking Skill (p. 163).
Umam, M. K., & Nada, R. K. (2024). Pengaruh Latar Belakang Pendidikan Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Bahasa Arab Kelas VII MTs Al Jauhar Semin Gunung Kidul. Al-Mu Arrib Journal of Arabic Education, 4(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.32923/al-muarrib.v4i1.4300
Yusof, S. M. (2021). Vygotsky Sociocultural Theory of Child Development : More Knowledgeable Other ( MKO ) and the Zone of Proximal Development ( ZPD ). Open University Malaysia, October. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35985.40804