DUALISME YURISDIKSI PERADILAN MILITER DAN UMUM DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN HAM OLEH TNI

Authors
  • Chelsea Kairadinda Adam

    Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
    Author
  • Irwan Triadi

    Author
Keywords:
Dual Jurisdiction, Military Courts, Human Rights Violations, Indonesian National Armed Forces, Legal Reform
Abstract

The dual jurisdiction between military and civilian courts in handling human rights violations committed by members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) presents significant challenges to the enforcement of justice and the rule of law. Military courts, under Law No. 31 of 1997, are authorized to prosecute TNI personnel, including in cases involving human rights violations. However, the system has been widely criticized for its lack of independence and transparency, which may lead to impunity. Although the Constitutional Court Decision No. 34/PUU-XI/2013 mandated that TNI members who commit general crimes, especially gross human rights violations, must be tried in civilian courts, this decision has not been fully implemented due to the absence of legislative amendments. This study uses a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis with military judicial systems in other countries. The findings highlight the urgent need for military court reform, stronger external oversight, and clear jurisdictional boundaries to ensure that victims' rights are upheld in a fair and transparent legal process.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2025-06-23
Section
Articles

How to Cite

DUALISME YURISDIKSI PERADILAN MILITER DAN UMUM DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN HAM OLEH TNI. (2025). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 14(6), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.6679/6rjybv12

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

21-30 of 265

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.