DAMPAK KONFLIK PERBATASAN WILAYAH DOKLAM TERHADAP KEAMANAN EKOLOGIS BHUTAN

Main Article Content

Siti Nuna Raisyah

Abstract

The research will discuss how conflicting political interests in the border region of three countries, Bhutan, China and India, have an impact on Bhutan's efforts to maintain the country's ecological security. This research aims to analyze the political power gap between the three countries and the threat from the dominant power to the supporting aspects of the commitment to carbon neutrality and environmental protection. The research was conducted through a qualitative method with data collection techniques in the form of literature review which was then analyzed to produce descriptive explanations. The concept of political ecology was used to see the context of interests and political power of each actor. As a result, the border conflict involving Bhutan, China and India is considered to have an impact on Bhutan's efforts to maximize forest areas and seek the development of wildlife reserves in the Sakteng


area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DAMPAK KONFLIK PERBATASAN WILAYAH DOKLAM TERHADAP KEAMANAN EKOLOGIS BHUTAN. (2025). Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 10(4), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.9963/e7vamq39

References

Benjaminsen, T . A., & Svarstad, H. (2018). Encyclopedia of Ecology (B. D. Fath, Ed.). Elsevier

Science.

Chen, E, M., & Jaffe, A. M. (2007). Energy security: Meeting the growing challenge of national

oil companies. Whitehead J. Dipl. & Int'l Rel, 9.

Dharmawan, A. (2007). Dinamika Sosio‐Ekologi Pedesaan: Perspektif dan Pertautan Keilmuan

Ekologi Manusia, Sosiologi Lingkungan dan Ekologi Politik. Sodality, 1(1), 2-37.

Ethirajan, A. (2020, November 25). Why Bhutan's Sakteng wildlife sanctuary is disputed by

China. BBC News.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-55004196?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Herdiansyah, H. (2019). Pengelolaan Konflik Sumber Daya Alam Terbarukan di Perbatasan dalam

Pendekatan Ekologi Politik. JURNAL HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL, 7(2), 143-151.

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/478839865.pdf

Kanupriya, G. (2017). Sustainable development and spirituality: A critical analysis of GNH index.

International Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 1919-1939.

Mardiana, V. (2020). KRISIS DOKLAM DAN KEPENTINGAN NASIONAL INDIA. Review of International

Relations, 2(2), 91-102.

https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/rir/article/view/17966/10558

Prakoso, H. A., Anwar, V. A., & Malasari. (2024). Relevansi Ide Poin SDG’s dan GNH Dalam

Implementasi Pembangunan Sosial-Ekonomi yang Adil Melalui Sektor Pariwisata di Bhutan.

JURNAL PARTISIPATORIS, 6(1), 73-92.

S, A. (2025, Maret 5). Bagaimana Bhutan Jadi Satu-satunya Negara dengan Emisi Karbon

Negatif? National Geographic Indonesia.

https://nationalgeographic.grid.id/read/134224213/bagaimana-bhutan-jadi-satu-satunya

-negara-dengan-emisi-karbon-negatif?page=all

Sayyidati, A. (2017). Isu Pemanasan Global dalam Pergeseran Paradigma Keamanan pada Studi

Hubungan Internasional. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(1), 39-45.

file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/2300-Article%20Text-10436-3-10-20180925.pdf

Tetsuro, M. (2019). Bhutan: environmental education and gross national happiness (gnh).

Primates, 60(2), 103-108.

VoA Indonesia. (2022, 1 18). Pembangunan China di Himalaya Meluas ke Perbatasan Sengketa

dengan Bhutan. VoA Indonesia.

https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pembangunan-china-di-himalaya-meluas-ke-perbatasa

n-sengketa-dengan-bhutan/6401476.html

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.