THE EFFECTIVENESS OF READTHEORY IN READING COMPREHENSION OF SIXTH SEMESTER STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITAS BHINNEKA PGRI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas penggunaan platform ReadTheory dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pemahaman mahasiswa semester enam di Universitas Bhinneka PGRI. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan desain pre-eksperimental tipe one-group pre-test and post-test. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes pilihan ganda yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya peningkatan skor rata-rata dari 70,83 pada pre-test menjadi 90,83 pada post-test. Hasil uji paired sample t-test menunjukkan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,002 (p < 0,05) yang berarti terdapat perbedaan signifikan sebelum dan sesudah penggunaan ReadTheory. Hasil uji reliabilitas juga menunjukkan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,914 untuk pre-test dan 0,899 untuk post-test yang menandakan bahwa instrumen yang digunakan sangat reliabel. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa ReadTheory efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pemahaman mahasiswa. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar ReadTheory dapat diterapkan sebagai media pembelajaran tambahan dalam pengajaran membaca di perguruan tinggi.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Anqoudi, A. A., Al-Shahrani, H. S., & Al-Shehri, S. A. (2023). Improving EFL learners’ reading motivation with intensive reading using ReadTheory. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 1-16.
Capodieci, A., Lachini, S., & Pinto, G. (2020). The use of educational technology for reading instruction in primary school: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 543.
Carrión, P. P. (2018). Online ReadTheory program impact on the development of EFL students' reading skills. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 65-75.
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for education practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11.
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66-67.
Mackiewicz, J. (2018). The population and sample in educational research. Journal of Research Methodology, 4(1), 45-50.
Moghadam, H. Z., Rafatbakhsh, M., & Fallah, E. (2023). The impact of critical thinking strategies on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(3), 582-589.
Özdemir, E., & Akyol, H. (2019). The development of a reading comprehension test: Validity and reliability study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 593-602.
Ph.D. Ummul Aiman, M., Wahyuni, A., & Aryani, S. (2022). Pre-experimental research in education: Concepts and procedures. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(2), 150-158.
Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). How can students improve their reading comprehension skill? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229-240.
Rodriguez, L. D. (2025). The relationship between reading comprehension and academic performance: A study of socio-economic and cognitive factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(1), 50-60.
Romeo, K. E., Gentile, L. M., & Bernhardt, E. B. (2016). The role of feedback in reading comprehension instruction: A case study of the ReadTheory platform. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 32(6), 574-584.
Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The importance of four skills and their integration in English language teaching. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(1), 101-105.
Soruç, A., Çalışkan, E., & Demir, G. (2022). Self-regulation and language skills as predictors of academic success in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 45-57.
Tempest, A. (2018). Implementation of ReadTheory in a university EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 20(2), 68-85.
Yusri, M. (2020). Quantitative research: A guide to method selection and statistical analysis. Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 30-45.